Yesterday, June 8, the New York Times briefly released a story entitled “Mars’ Pasteques Fields, Police say.” The article was soon removed, but not before a number of people. ‘found, archived him and speculated on what he meant. The article page has since been replaced by a notice of error alerting warning readers that the article has been published by mistake – and, yes, the content was entirely false.
The media of popular news is currently invested in a future “UFO” report that the government should release later this month, as well as apparently non-human vehicle reports operating in military airspace etc.. This may be that New York Times’s article is even more fun because he briefly talked about “extraterrestrials of fruits” and why they are to blame for a mass of pains from March.
“The FBI’s decline in commenting on past watermelon reports, but confirmed that kiwis were intercepted. This story is terribly boring, “the archived version of the article is read. The title appeared on Google News, which is the one that was found for the first time by people to futurism.
As you probably guessed, the article is Gibberish and was published by mistake on the website, with a spokesman for New York Times, saying to futurism, the content is a mocking article, and not real reports. The company’s team tested its content system and accidentally published a fake article on the live website.
If you visit the article URL now, it provides a notice indicating that “a fake article for a test system has been inadvertently published on this page earlier.” Although the story is strange, it was not surprising – these types of test items are deliberately composed of nonsense so that no one is wrong for real reports.
More Stories
How Can Data Fabric Be Used To Improve Data Governance?
5 Easy Steps to Make a YouTube Outro
How to solve [pii_email_6156512824f342737f9c] error?